Imagine a compliance platform costs you $12,000 per year. How much is that?
The replacement it makes will decide the final answer.
If automating the collection of evidence in a complicated technology environment eliminates hundreds hours of repetitive work, then $12,000 is an investment worth it. The math would be different for a start-up of seven people could collect the same evidence in just one or two minutes per month.
This is a good way to find Vanta alternatives. Do not start by asking what platform has the greatest features. Ask your company about how these features can help you save time and money.
Automation Has an Economic Break-Even The Key
Automation of compliance isn’t always good or bad. The value of it changes as you grow. Imagine a growing technology company that has multiple cloud environments and multiple applications. Gathering evidence manually can be a huge operational burden. Integrations which automatically monitor systems and gather evidence are able to justify the cost.
Imagine a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2. It could have a small infrastructure, and documentation of the evidence could be managed with no significant automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. The capabilities of a sophisticated platform are amazing, but they are only useful when an organization needs them.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a comparison that could easily be a feature by feature exercise. The two platforms are built on automation and integrated with each other, which means that companies looking for this type of approach will benefit from having a look at the frameworks available with their integrations, service as well as individual quotations and contracts.
But there’s still another decision you need to make. Does your business want an integration-driven platform for compliance at all? Some companies prefer continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection, and automated evidence collection. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors don’t all follow the same model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete in the same category of automation. The market also has lightweight platforms that are designed to focus on management rather than comprehensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of the latter group. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors and compliance specialists. It organizes framework controls into a central workspace. It also allows for editing of guidelines for policy as well as evidence. Auditors can review the evidence provided through a purely read interface.
It doesn’t connect to operational systems, or install infrastructure agents. Customers decide to upload the proof they wish to provide.
The System Access consideration in the Decision
The detachment of integrations comes with its limitations: one must be able to manually collect evidence.
This also means that integration setup is eliminated and also means that the application doesn’t require standing connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
Both architectures are equally good. The key question is what best choice is appropriate to your business.
CertAssist is a solution for teams with between five to 200 members. Its pricing is published rather than requiring the salesperson to obtain the initial price. The price stated for the launch of CertAssist is $225 a month in comparison to a regular $375.
Let Complexity Take Its Rightful Place
What a start-up with 10 employees needs today might not be the same for 500 or 100 employees.
While compliance is straightforward, a lightweight platform may make sense. As the number of employees, systems frameworks, evidence and requirements increases, economics may eventually favour deeper automation. It is better to let the complex technology of compliance earn its rightful place.
Do not pay for 50 integrations merely because they appear attractive on a comparison chart. It is best to pay for them only if the cost to do the task by hand is greater.